University student Pınar Gültekin was killed by Cemal Metin Avcı in Muğla. The body of Gültekin, who was murdered on July 16, was found in a barrel in a forest area 5 days after the incident.
Pınar was beaten first, then strangled by squeezing, then her body was put in a barrel and burned. Concrete was poured on it. In the investigation initiated, the traces of the perpetrator were found after a short time.
Cemal Metin Avcı, who runs a bar in Muğla, was caught as the perpetrator of the incident. The hunter confessed that he killed Pinar in his interrogation. some claims accusing Fountainhead was coined.
developments scare in Ankara .. they were shocked that they were what! Turkey
6-Sheet Appendix EXPRESSIONS
hunters arrested A while after he was sent to prison, he applied to the prosecutor’s office and said, “I want to make an additional statement.” He continued to accuse Pınar Gültekin, whom he murdered, in his handwritten 6-page statement. She claimed that she had a relationship and that Pinar was constantly asking her for money by threatening to tell her about this relationship to her husband. In a part of his statement, Avcı also mentioned D.Y., the prosecutor working in Muğla Courthouse.
According to Avcı’s statement, prosecutor D.Y. also had a relationship with Pınar Gültekin. Prosecutor D.Y. even met with the school dean and his teachers for Pinar’s low grades. After a while, he tried to put pressure on Pınar Gültekin because of this relationship. According to the claim of Avcı, who said that Pınar told him about all this, Pınar also said to him, “Even the Prosecutor D. cannot do anything to me, who are you, will you do it”. Hunter also said that the prosecutor wanted to sell his car, so they met when a friend directed the prosecutor to him; He said, “I did not believe in the case of the prosecutor D. at first, but after meeting the prosecutor,” he said. The number of new cases of coronavirus … The world
Following Avcı’s statements, HSK launched an investigation. A chief inspector was appointed for the investigation. In this process, the appointment of the Prosecutor D.Y. went to Erzurum. However, the prosecutor D.Y., who took leave, sent a letter of resignation to HSK before starting his duty in Erzurum. D.Y. In his petition, he stated the reason for his resignation as “family reasons”. Hürriyet reached the prosecutor D.Y. He said that his resignation had nothing to do with the Pınar Gültekin incident and that he resigned due to “special reasons”.
“Your name is mentioned in the statements of the perpetrator Cemal Metin Avcı?” He answered the question “Maybe”. D.Y. said, “I don’t know,” when asked whether the HSK was conducting an investigation against him. D.Y. did not answer the question as to whether he knew Pınar Gültekin.
The investigation initiated by the HSK continues. In addition to the prosecutor who resigned within the scope of the investigation, the statements of Cemal Metin Avcı and other persons mentioned in the statements will also be taken.